- kennisvanstadenregio
- Kennisdossiers
- Kennisdossier Bevolkingsdaling
- Publicaties over krimp (2022-2006)
- Defining ‘Success’ of Local Citizens’ Initiatives in Maintaining Public Services in Rural Areas: A Professional's Perspective
Inhoud
- Bevolkingsdaling: wat is het?
- Beleid voor bevolkingsdaling: een korte geschiedenis
2.1 De krimp bestrijden
2.2 Bewustwording: Eerste Actieplan Bevolkingsdaling – 2009
2.3 Programmering en uitvoering: Tweede Actieplan Bevolkingsdaling – 2016
2.4 Provincies
2.5 Gemeenten - Bevolkingsontwikkeling en prognoses
3.1 Inleiding
3.2 Drijvende krachten achter bevolkingsontwikkeling
3.3 Bevolkingsontwikkeling in Nederland
3.4 De zeggingskracht van prognoses
3.5 Onwaarschijnlijkheden en scenario’s
3.6 Conclusie - Ontwikkelingen per domein
4.1 Wonen
4.2 Gezondheid en zorg
4.3 Onderwijs
4.4 Regionale economie en arbeidsmarkt
4.5 Bereikbaarheid - Praktijkvoorbeelden
5.1 Aanpak huisartsentekort
5.2 Toekomstgericht bouwen in Biggekerke
5.3 Zelfrijdende shuttlebus bij Ommelander ziekenhuis
5.4 Toekomst wonen in Beltrum
5.5 Gefaseerde strategie voor de herontwikkeling van Rolduckerveld
Contact
Defining ‘Success’ of Local Citizens’ Initiatives in Maintaining Public Services in Rural Areas: A Professional's Perspective
In the shift towards the Big Society, it is widely proclaimed that citizen participation and citizens’ initiatives are indispensable to maintaining services that used to be run by local or regional governments. Despite the increased interest in citizens’ initiatives, research has scarcely debated what actually defines the success of such initiatives. Using focus group discussions, this study examined the meanings and norms collectively constructed by government officials and professionals regarding the success and failure of citizens’ initiatives in rural areas. Remarkably, we found that the professional perspective of successful citizens’ initiatives was not dominated by the achievement of actual policy targets or project goals, such as maintaining public services. Rather, an initiative was perceived as successful as long as citizens are continuously active and in charge. Arguably, this somewhat paternalistic professional view of successful citizens’ initiatives could be challenged by the volunteers in those initiatives.